Andhra Pradesh High Court Judgments — 2023

The High Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. This means the appellant failed to appear or present their case before the court.

The High Court dismissed the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal. This dismissal was due to the lack of prosecution by the appellant. No costs were awarded.

The High Court dismissed the appeal. This was due to the absence of any representation for the appellant when the case was called.

The High Court dismissed the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal. The dismissal was due to the lack of representation from the appellant, meaning they failed to prosecute their case.

The High Court dismissed the Income Tax Appeal due to the appellant's failure to prosecute the case. No costs were awarded.

The High Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution as there was no representation for the appellant on the day of hearing. No costs were awarded.

The High Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. This means the appellant failed to present their case or pursue the appeal further.

The High Court dismissed the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal for want of prosecution. No costs were awarded.

The High Court dismissed the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal for want of prosecution. This means the appellant failed to appear or present their case before the court.

The appellant's counsel informed the court that due to subsequent developments, the appellant did not wish to press the appeals. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the appeals as not pressed.

The High Court permitted the Income Tax Department to withdraw the appeal. Liberty was granted to seek restoration if the appeal falls under exceptions in another circular.